Right-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis: Clinical Features, Sonographic Appearances, and Management (2024)

Abstract

KEYWORDS: complication, computed tomography, recurrent right-sided diverticulitis, ultrasonography

Introduction

Colonic diverticulitis is a common condition affecting the adult population. Traditionally, the sigmoid colon is considered the most commonly involved part, and right-sided diverticulitis is much rarer [1]. However, in the Asian countries, right-sided diverticulitis outnumbers the left [2]. The right-sided diverticulitis differs from the left-sided diverticulitis in many aspects. The former is usually congenital and solitary [3,4]. Most importantly, the right-sided diverticulitis often resembles the acute appendicitis in clinical presentation. Therefore, image studies are mandatory to make a correct diagnosis [2,5]. Computed tomography (CT) is generally accepted as an imaging of choice in the diagnosis of colonic diverticulitis [6]. However, ultrasonography (US) is more economic than CT and poses no radiation, which is particularly important since the patients having right-sided diverticulitis are relatively younger [4] and are thus more susceptible to radiation-induced malignancy [7]. The US appearance of right-sided diverticulitis is less well documented. This study focused on the demographic data, US appearances, and treatment outcomes of right-sided colonic diverticulitis based on the review of 14 patients.

Material and methods

The study was conducted in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. It has about 3000 beds in service. We retrospectively searched the sonography report archive from March 2007 to March 2014. Reports containing the keyword “diverticulitis” were selected. The medical records were reviewed. Of these, 14 US-diagnosed or suspected of right-sided diverticulitis were included for analysis. Among them, 10 patients had CT scans as confirmation. Demographic data including age, sex, comorbidity, and clinical features, such as fever, leukocytosis, inflammatory marker, tenderness, lesion location, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea/constipation, treatment, complication, and time to recurrence were documented. The mean age along with standard deviation and distribution of other demographic and clinical features were analyzed. The US images of each patient and available CT images were reviewed and categorized based upon their image features.

Results

In total, 14 (8 male and 6 female) patients, with a mean age of 52.1 years, were analyzed. The demographic information is shown in Table 1. Comorbidities including history of diverticulosis, appendectomy, and other chronic systemic disease are also listed in Table 1. The clinical features and presentations are shown in Table 2. The most common presentations are right lower quadrant abdominal pain (92.9%), leukocytosis (57.1%), and fever (28.6%). Divertic-ulitis developed in cecum and ascending colon with a similar frequency (35.7%, 5/14). In 28.6% of the cases, the lesion sites cannot be distinguished between the two.

Among the 14 patients, six major sonographic findings were observed (Table 3). The most common features are surrounding echogenic fat (50%) and diverticular wall thickening (50%; Figures ​Figures11 and ​and2),2), intradiverticular echo-genic material (50%; Figures ​Figures22–4), followed by enlarged regional lymph node (21.4%; Figure 5).

Two (14.3%) patients suffered from recurrence at 2 months and 19 months, respectively, after the first episode. Two (14.3%) patients had abscess formation, and one (7.1%) patient had perforation. All but two (86%) patients received conservative treatment only. In one (7.1%) patient, US demonstrated a pocket of fluid accumulation, suggestive of pus. The subsequent CT-guided aspiration confirmed the nature of an abscess (Figure 6). The second patient had recurrent diverticulitis and complicated with colovesical fistula 2 months later. Therefore, this patient received an elective right hemicolectomy.

Discussion

Diverticulitis is the inflammation of the diverticulum. The exact pathogenesis is still unclear [8]. It is thought to be related to several factors including diet, colon microbes, genetic factors, and colonic motility. While rare in the Western population [9], right-sided acute colonic divertic-ulitis is more prevalent in the Asian population. However, the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management are less well described in the literature [10].

In our study, the clinical presentations, such as right lower abdominal pain and tenderness (93%), fever (28.6%), and leukocytosis (57.1%), do not allow a confident diagnosis of right-sided diverticulitis, and differentiation between acute appendicitis and diverticulitis is almost impossible. Although some author had purposed several clinical features including prodromal symptoms, location of rebound tenderness, white blood cell differential count to differentiate these two entities [11], the clinical utility remained unclear. In an earlier study, a correct preoperative diagnosis of right-sided diverticulitis was rare and acute appendicitis was the presumed diagnosis in most cases [12,13]. Tan et al [14] reported an operation rate of 22.1% for right-sided acute colonic diverticulitis upon the suspicion for acute appendicitis. Most of those patients had not received a CT scan prior to surgery. Appendectomy and right hemicolectomy [14,15] were the most commonly performed procedure. In Western countries, where US or CT were the primary imaging tools for right lower abdominal pain, the operation rate due to presumed acute appendicitis was over 30% [16]. In contrast, none (0/14) of our patients received emergent surgery since US allowed clear and confident differentiation between acute appendicitis and right-sided colonic diverticulitis. Chou et al [17] reported an accuracy of 100% in differentiating the two diseases using US. The much higher incidence of right-sided acute diverticulitis in the Asian population might allow both radiologists and clinicians to make correct diagnosis pre-operatively. The most common findings of diverticulitis in our study were diverticular wall thickening (50%) and surrounding echogenic fat (50%; Figures ​Figures1A1A and ​and2A)2A) and intradiverticular echogenic material (50%; Figures ​Figures2A,2A, ​,3A3A—B, ​,4A4A—B). Our findings for right-sided acute colonic diverticulitis are similar to those reported by Parulekar [18] and Zielke et al [19]. Other sonographic features, such as adjacent lymph node enlargement (Figure 5A), fluid accumulation (Figures ​(Figures6A6A–B), and increased color flow signal (Figures ​(Figures3A3A and ​and4B),4B), were also reported by other authors [20,21]. Knowledge of the US presentations may facilitate a correct diagnosis using US and obviate an unnecessary surgery.

In our series, right-sided diverticulitis developed in the cecum and ascending colon with the same frequency (35.7%). In the other patients, the location was indistinguishable. Diverticulitis in the proximal transverse colon was not detected, probably due to its rarity [15] and the relatively small sample size. Previous studies showed a slight predominance of ascending colon over the cecum [15,22]; this may be because most patients referred for US study were due to the right lower abdominal pain.

Complicated acute colonic diverticulitis, defined as diverticulitis with associated abscess, phlegmon, fistula, obstruction, bleeding, or perforation [23,24,25], developed in 21.4% of our patients. Oh et al [22] reported a 57.5% rate of complicated right-sided acute diverticulitis in Korea. However, the complicated diverticulitis rate might be underestimated since the study focused on diverticulitis diagnosed by using US. Patients having more severe clinical presentation would probably receive a CT scan initially. One of our patients had a ruptured right-sided acute diverticulitis and abscess. The initial clinical presentation was also right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Sonographic evaluation demonstrated an ill-defined fluid accumulation. Under the suspicion of diverticulum rupture and abscess formation, contrast-enhanced CT study was performed, and it revealed a rim-enhancing lesion involving the ascending colon and right psoas muscle. The patient subsequently received CT-guided abscess drainage in addition to medical treatment. No surgery was performed, and the patient recovered well without other complications. Two (14.2%) of our patients suffered from abscess without overt divertic-ulum perforation. The sonography pattern included wall thickening, pericolic fluid accumulation, detectable color flow signal in the diverticular wall, and intradiverticular echogenic structures. On the other hand, the rest (78.5%) of our patients having uncomplicated diverticulitis were successfully managed by medical treatment, including antibiotics, intravenous fluid support, and bowel rest. The mean admission duration was 5.9 (4—8) days, and three patients were treated in the outpatient department. No subsequent complication developed during the admission period. During the mean follow-up period of 40.7 (10—71) months, only two (14.2%) of the patients had an episode of recurrence, which developed at 2 months and 19 months after the initial attack. Several studies had evaluated the recurrence rate of diverticulitis. Mizuki et al [26] reported a recurrence rate of 24.6% in patients with mild to moderate right-sided acute colonic diverticulitis treated in the outpatient department. Two studies had suggested that the recurrence rate in inpatient and outpatient departments were similar [27,28]. One possible explanation is that a majority of our patients had minor diverticulitis; only 21.4% of them had abscess. Tan et al 15] reported a recurrence rate of 4.9% during the mean follow-up period of 40 months, which is similar to what we had observed. A majority of their patients also had Hinchey Ia disease. Furthermore, 28.6% (4/14) of the patients had received appendectomy previously, which is higher than the estimated 8.6% male and 6.7% female lifetime risk of acute appendicitis [29]. The causes have not been investigated. However, it is possible that some of them actually had a right-sided diverticulitis instead of appendicitis.

There are limitations to our study. First, it is a retrospective study. Second, the study focused on diverticulitis detected by US; therefore, the sample size is limited. It probably affected the collected patient group owing to the clinical practice tendency to select CT as the first-line screening tool for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. Most of our patients had relatively mild severity. Third, this is a single-center study; the demographic data of our hospital may differ from the data of other hospitals. Although, there is no evidence suggesting the sonographic appearance differ between the elderly and young, treatment approach might be influenced by patient condition. Finally, the diagnosis of diverticulitis was usually made clinically. Few cases had pathologic proof.

In conclusion, right-sided acute colonic diverticulitis is usually a benign and self-limiting condition. Surgery is rarely needed. US features, including diverticular wall thickening, surrounding echogenic fat, intradiverticular echogenic material, provide clear information for making correct preoperative diagnosis. Ambiguous US studies may be complemented with a contrast-enhanced CT. Recognizing the clinical patterns and image appearances can obviate unnecessary appendectomy.

Footnotes

References